Why target was not achieved? I
refer to the postulate that clearly I put in during the election campaign before the first round: "In this election, it is important to win Jaroslaw Kaczynski in the first round by a large majority." Therefore, I feel obliged to try to answer the question: Why is this goal has not been achieved? Before I your answer, I would like to clearly say what the reasons for failure reject or skipping. Please reject all explanations that treat the Polish voters en bloc as evil, irrational or intellectually gnuśnych, Finally, terrified and submissive. I write about it clearly, because there is the temptation of simple emotional judgments. In this study, essentially skipping the issue of manipulation and electoral fraud, which eventually would have to look at separately.
Obr. 1. Results of presidential elections in 2010
analyzing the attitude of society, one must first ask ourselves what we are fighting. But in the end is not involved in this struggle for the PiS or about Jaroslaw Kaczynski, being with great respect for the political achievements of this group and its leader. If Poland is so important for us, that's not because of our fields and towns, not about our beautiful language, or even the legacy of our great history. It all makes sense only under the condition of the existence and involvement of millions of people who live here, speak Polish, and even a little familiar with the story. Without these attributes Polishness people would be dead and would lose its meaning. And these people have to decide whether or not these attributes are still Polishness to them, and if so, to what extent, if they are willing to, for example, some sacrifices for the Polish culture. We can not place over ordinary Poles. Rather, we must together with them to consider what to do next with our Polish identity and whether you want the absolute power held the band, whose leader believes that "the Polish character is insane."
Feedback and presidential elections in 2010 gives a picture of the condition of our society. We must try to look at this condition. In such an assessment-analysis is very easy is to make a simple mistake. Politykujące People have very clear ideas on Polish politics and the most widely known standard set of arguments in support of these views. Both sides of the litigation over the years, privately, publicly or through the Internet, crystallized their arguments and got to know your opponent's arguments. Disputes of this are slowly becoming a bit boring, predictable ritual. Possible error in assessing the voters is the simple transfer of a well-known political dispute for all voters, and the assumption that the entire electorate of the candidate knows and shares the force in the During the political line.
Approximately 17 million people who participated in the 2010 presidential election, we can distinguish a large number of people with well-defined political sympathies. This is a huge diverse group internally. Now I'll try to make a brief analysis of this group, distinguishing within it some specific groups. The first group among people with clear political sympathies are, of course, professional politicians and those involved in politics, a few hundred thousand members of various parties and individuals may be twice as many independents, whose interests are closely dependent on the political situation. Let's add their immediate families, and we get a group numbering about 2 million people, which can be conventionally called a defining insiders. Another group of people who take care of my knowledge and belief as structured, the daily life a bit beyond the typical work and leisure. By nature, people from this group have crystallized the views of a possible change is not easy - it is usually preceded by a revolution worldview long process of accumulation of doubt and searching. This group conventionally call intellectuals. Another group of people willing to politykujący privately, whether in real life or on the Internet - by convention: amateurs. Amateur and intellectuals are part of the joint, but all amateurs is much more than intellectuals. Most amateurs is quite shallow wiedzęna about political developments and their views do not have a strong evidence base, they take the arguments straight from the media, and at the same time, this mass transfer deal quite literally. They lack a critical approach to the incoming information, often seriously so. "Authorities", such as actor and singer who conspicuously in favor of a particular political option. Amateur often very much emotionally involved in discussions on the political option, which sympathize. On the borderline of contractual intellectuals and amateurs situate political bloggers. intellectuals and amateurs a total of more than 2-3 million people. I make even a contractual term for all persons with a well-defined sympathies including the political (ie, the three specific groups in total). These people a politically active , and shortly I will be talking about them: active, their opposition is politically inactive , a silent majority . Summing up the working estimate: we have 38 million inhabitants, including the 31 million eligible to vote. In this June 20 election was attended by 17 million people and 14 million have not availed themselves of this right (turnout 55%). Next, using the nomenclature adopted by me, with 17 million voters is about 5 million politically active , voters who have decided consciously, guided by their interests or the strong and more or less motivated conviction (for simplicity assume that all active consistently vote), some 12 million voters are people voting politically inactive.
be emphasized very clearly: most of the discussion on the arguments that they may be, all this unrelenting political battle in recent years takes place within a maximum of 5 million people (I think this number is overestimated rather than underestimated.) In the course of these discussions have already been outlined some fields the discussion, reference points, common conceptual code. For example, if the password falls Cimoszewicz-Jarucka is a person belonging to the contractual 5 million are emerging from the independent associations, with which political option that person sympathizes. There is therefore an association with the atmosphere of the elections 2005, the tangle of interests and conflicts between the main political forces: SLD, PO and PiS, recalls the insidious attacks and a strange capitulation, and finally emerge from the memory of the individual narratives of the parties involved in this event. In this context, appears to our evaluation of these narratives and possible adoption of one of them as a probable. For other Poles Cimoszewicz-Jarucka password is completely blank. If you do not believe, then let 's do an experiment and ask for the combination of several persons whom you know that do not belong to active - do not belong to any political party, do not work in an executive position in government or in corporate blogging is not, nor passionately politykują in another form. You may - like me - to tell a joke that you're doing a private survey or poll. Such a person is in the best case it will associate Cimoszewicz as a prominent left-wing politics, who once served an important function, and now occupies a politically somewhere on the border between the SLD and the PO. One of my people what Opel acknowledged that Cimoszewicz associated with the roles once a high function in the country, and that the close circle of associates and times Mazowiecki and Oleksy.
Obr. 3. Terra incognita [source: Mouse-eater on deviantART ]
probably already seen, where I'm going. These 12 million voters are terra incognita. Even if we stood on his head, there is no simple way to get to them, put them to the truth about the state of Polish affairs and communicate our concerns about the future of the acquiring country. The problem is the same interest in their political discourse and conceptual barriers to overcome. For many of them most easily hit sensations and scandals, are easily to stereotypes, and they do not have the time and inclination to fight with their stereotypes. The arguments are important for a large part of this group are moral issues and the approach to the Church. In the years of downturn and impoverishment become the most important economic issues. Ordinary people want is first and foremost pursue their material aspirations - apartment, a car, an attractive holiday, have a job, but also as far as possible to avoid having to overwork.
in Poland has been prepared and refined media and political apparatus, which allows you to efficiently redirect the frustrations of the millions of voters, so that the true power elite consistently stable in its place. Individuals and political projects in question serve as the political theater. A classic example is the arrangement - as it turned out years later - the choice in 1995 between two agents, SB, Walesa and Kwasniewski. And it was a choice, which aroused the greatest public excitement over these 21 years - in the second round turnout was 68%. Another classic example of political theater is the UW - the party, which gradually przepoczwarzyła in the PO, while maintained in parallel lansujący faction known as left-wing projects (PD, then the Left and Democrats), all of these projects operate within a range of interests (hint: the support given this circle by Gazeta Wyborcza). Another example of this behavior and draw Lech Walesa, depending on current needs. The key moments you can see the convergence of the interests of all those factions. In recent years, well it can be seen in the common and complementary to the attacks on the PiS.
voter belonging to the group of inactive usually easier than changing the political sympathies active, but is essentially beyond the reach of our influence. Manipulation of the media, although not clear as ever, with regard to inactive are still effective. That is why they are used, even at the expense of the whole expose and ridicule the official media in the eyes of more informed consumers. The idea is that a group of active belief is largely autonomous. People with sympathies of pro-PO did not deter even the biggest disgrace of the media, because for them it is simply a contribution to the victory of good cause. Those with pro-PiS sympathies are completely distanced from the official media and seeking their sympathy is regarded as pointless, or unnecessary. Only the practice of reconciliation in the morale of the PiS supporters by belittling them as a communication style Palikot, Provincial or contact lenses and his faithful viewers who spoke on the air, but that's another topic.
Themes which direct the electorates of individual political parties, are of course complex, these voters have a specific structure. Do not go here into these details because I was concerned primarily with demonstrating the inherent difficulties associated with the exchange of the ruling elites within the democratic order. These difficulties are, moreover, goes beyond the universal character of Poland today. The issue of exchange ruling elite can be even more generalized. Ruling elites all over the place, an era and political system have a tendency to degeneration, while preservation system and attempts to keep itself in power at any cost. In subsequent eras are changing only the names and methods, of course, increases the complexity of the system.
found at the point where the efforts of active - voters of one political party - coincided with the renewal process of the Polish nation from the ongoing good few years. A manifestation of this process was already the first period of the PiS government, which have significantly changed quite filled with concrete to 2005, balance of power in Poland. Today it is hard to believe that before the emergence in the mainstream any news nieaprobowanego by Michnik was virtually impossible for so many years that a foreign service official can prevail in the heart of the Polish state under the guise of WSI. We have achieved so little. This renewal process has been shaken in 2007 by a massive operation defender system, but gained a new powerful impetus after the disaster in Smolensk.
We hoped and believed wholeheartedly that the time has come to the Polish nation right now, in the first round of the extraordinary presidential election, spoke loudly and clearly their own voice in rejecting the degenerate ruling elite, hence the demand for Jaroslaw Kaczynski victory in the first round. Dan Kaczynski as a strong social legitimacy without a doubt would have great importance both for the ordering of the Interior, and for outside powers that are interested in interfering in our affairs. In short, power in Poland would be forced to be more taken into account in their plans for the interests of ordinary people and refrain from weakening the state of war with the opposition and outside countries would be forced to be more alert to the Polish interest in their calculations. For such a solution system was still too strong, and the dynamics of social processes in Poland was still weak.
What have we achieved in the first round?
Before I round of presidential elections in 2010 both sides had exaggerated expectations. system support its candidate, Bronislaw Komorowski, through the media and parts of the polls. Formal surveys published by TVN24 and Gazeta Wyborcza proved moon. 2 days before the election gave Komorowski from 15% to 18% advantage over Kaczynski, which must be set from 5% advantage acquired in the election. This a very big mistake. A Gazeta Wyborcza encouraged: "If such a result I ended up voting, instead of fighting before the second round would start to holiday." sounds impressive, but since the election result Komorowski has to decide someone's vacation, except his own and possibly its people? Do Gazeta Wyborcza now officially done for the newsletter OP?
must admit that there were also available in the media accurate surveys, such as TVP . It is interesting that a number of informal surveys, including many sites, gave very high advantage for Jaroslaw Kaczynski. In this case, it is difficult to have reservations, because polls are not rościły a claim to representativeness (with one exception, which is a social initiative surveys), for which they are obliged companies conducting official polls.
We are dealing with a situation in which most of the media is biased in favor of system. This is nothing new. system for 21 years so patriotic forces fighting, inventing at the same time for us to ever newer insults: oszołomy , Ciemnogród , anticommunists animal, the genetic patriots, last: mohair berets or mohery . The change lies in the fact that by 2005 the mainstream did not have the right to cut anything that would disrupt the message, and therefore the media bias for the scalar person was virtually imperceptible.
After 2005, has changed a lot. Already in 2005, editor in chief of Gazeta Polish was Thomas Sakiewicz. When you change the editor in chief Republic of Grzegorz Gauden on the Pawel Lisicki in 2006, the newspaper of the duplicate Gazeta Wyborcza evolved a great and objective newspaper. Breath of fresh air initially filed after its establishment in 2006 Official that the editorial pages supported with feigned impartiality Tusk, but allowed for the rise to prominence of many incorrect political columnists, like Matthias Rybinski. On television, despite a backlash system came a new message: cult programs Under current , special mission, programs Pospieszalskiego, Wildstein, Sakiewicza - it was a new quality. Catalyst for change in social consciousness is the Internet. Can no longer be silent in the Night changes, each of the Internet can easily reach both the film, as well as many many other films, exposing system. So we have a situation where the media bias is a fact of quite easily visible. This fact does not require the lengthy quest, and only a certain intellectual courage, beaten out of the rut of thought.
mentioned earlier the dynamics of social change and is described here gradually breaking the monopoly of the media is reflected in the results of the election. Let us the absolute numbers quietly to see how many Poles already broke internally propaganda system oppression and realize that - contrary to the propaganda - it is a growth process, and time is working in our favor.
Number of votes for parties and candidates for president in millions
elections 2005: the turnout - 40%, PiS - 3.2; PO - 2.8
2005 presidential election, first round: 50% turnout, Lech Kaczynski - 4.9, Donald Tusk - 5.4
2005 presidential elections, second round: 51% turnout, Lech Kaczynski - 8.3, Donald Tusk - 7.0
elections 2007: The turnout - 54%, PiS - 5.2; PO - 6.7
2010 presidential election, first round: 55% turnout, Jaroslaw Kaczynski - 6 , 1, Bronislaw Komorowski - 7.0
main part of this increase from 3.2 million in 2005, PiS supporters to 6.1 million votes cast for Jaroslaw Kaczynski in 2010, it did not increase in group active , and the millions of informal weight inactive, which in fact we know very little. This result is very significant to the fact that Law and Justice party is anti-system, that fight everyone. The first to adopt new political message the people most intellectually courageous and open. The process of change is not embraced yet known. lemmings who are most at home in the herd. When this occurs, the process can take the character of avalanche. We would, of course, that this has occurred as soon as possible. This is particularly important in terms of the evident slowdown in the international security. Geopolitical holidays are over. Consequences
first round
We enjoy what has been achieved. Contrary to the enchantment of reality by the media and government will be increasingly difficult to constantly insult them millions PiS voters, sending him to the corner, break, and pacify. The Polish electorate is a huge social capital. It rests in his hands today, our history and heritage of the responsibility for independent Poland. It is our duty to persevere and make it more and more Poles began to understand that the Polish character is great and encourage them to go to our website. But it would be absurd to deny the political consequences of the present state of social consciousness in Poland, such as that he is. Even if we know that the rules of the game are unfair.
election is tantamount to an irreversible decision is taken by the society at the moment and all that that implies. Polish State can be repaired or not. This can not be reflected until later, when the Poles finally to mature. Kaczynski in Poland, 2005-2007, by the clear suggestion: the eradication of the enormous output of money from the state budget, the reform of corporate law, disclosure of the SB agents, end the privileges of post-communists, the subjectivity in the international arena, ambitious finance reform public prepared by Zyta Gilowska, health care reform Zbigniew Religa, very important and lesser-known efforts to harmonize the information systems in public administration with simultaneous liquidation of a pathological dependency on a known company. In 2007 - regardless of the detailed analysis of election results - and this proposal was clearly rejected. After the historic event in Smolensk in 2010, accompanied us only one guiding principle: end to fratricidal conflicts and political struggles in the name of the rescue of Polish sovereignty. Result of first round and this time he did not give a positive response of society.
Far I'm from the denial of the collective wisdom of the nation. Social processes run your path, whether we like it or not, whether we understand it or not. Sooner or later, lead to changes and consequences, which can now we can not predict. Contrary to the propaganda - is the power exercised by the PO, and winds up provoking conflicts in our society. The economic downturn and the growing frustration may lead to the replacement of the elites will be more turbulent than it would if a party media and government społeczeństwo treated seriously and not abused so much of its influence. Or perhaps waiting for us yet another unimaginable changes.
recommendations before the second round of
"The key to victory, the final victory, because these elections are not completed, our faith, our belief that one can and must win." These words Jaroslaw Kaczynski after the first round of elections are good general tips on how to behave in that situation.
We must clearly realize that we are not just counting what even a powerful social force. Mazovia is generally the courage to proclaim their views, we are quite seasoned in the polemical battles with opponents specializing in manipulations pyskówkach and defamation. We love Poland, their families and we are beautiful. Yes, do not be afraid to say it. The created the myth that is a beautiful example pulpet Michal Figurski slimy or oily grandfather Kazimierz Kutz. The television programs we know so peaceful and warm people such as John or Thomas Pospiech Sakiewicz who do not use violent words, nor offend no one. However system focuses on them in the anger and creates them on the incarnation of evil, people full of mindless hatred, and finally, the ugly. Not by chance in almost every relationship on television, or patriotic rally rally PiS supporters must appear ugly people who scream insults at a primitive current of power. It is interesting that in such outfits specialize "friends in the media" - the editorial offices of TVN and Polsat. I'm glad I was not successful provocation Palikot in Lublin. Very telling was the instigator of the picture, which showed the lens fucka. According to plan, this picture has become This election campaign symbol PiS supporters, and became a symbol of the methods to be applied AFTER - face fierce and arrogant, stretched middle finger, and a complete lack of scruples in the use of dirty tricks.
Obr. 4. 13.04.1910, Lech Kaczynski opponents protest in Krakow
Obr. 5. 09/06/1910 , the man who had become a symbol of aggression, PiS supporters. When it appeared that it could be a provocation Palikot, the matter was hushed up quickly [source: Gazeta Wyborcza]
Obr. 6. 10/05/1910 , March of Remembrance in Warsaw. That the mainstream media do not want to know, do not want to see, do not want to hear [source: Blogpress.pl]
They will want us quarrel, break up and destroy. We have to keep a positive kind of animosity. This bitterness has to be aimed at achieving the overarching goal - a fully sovereign Polish. Other issues are secondary, old wrongs and injuries go down into the background. Given the election results in the first round must be Set on a long march, which aims to achieve in the next year of full power in Poland by the united forces of patriotism. My call for victory in the first round was not the result of arrogance or a desire spectacular burial opponent. Such a victory would certainly be a major political demonstration, as previously mentioned. It was also about showing the red card for public use in the methods Janusz Palikot policy. Since we did not succeed, that party media and the government will feel authorized to continue to use these methods. Belligerent statements suggest that on the other stronie jest wielka liczba osób, które lepiej czują się w wojnie na zniszczenie przeciwnika niż w sporach merytorycznych. Oni będą rozgrzewać emocje i dążyć do ostrej konfrontacji, my musimy odpowiadać spokojem i godnością, z wyrozumiałością ludzi mądrzejszych, rozumiejących więcej, patrzących dalej.
Niektórzy po naszej stronie podważają sens zwycięstwa Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w wyborach prezydenckich. Mówią, że ten polityk jest lepszy do rządzenia i lepiej, by poczekał do wyborów parlamentarnych, po których będzie prawdopodobieństwo, że zostanie premierem. Według tej the concept of small PiS defeat in the presidential election might be a good starting point to fight for victory in parliamentary elections. This is a wrong strategy. First, a candidate in order to win. Plan B is implemented after any defeat, not before. Second, absolute power of the Civic Platform would be a huge threat to Polish and Polish to civil liberties. Thirdly, (remember that) in this fight is not about either the PiS Jarosław Kaczyński, just about to make the Polish flourishing and strong country. For this you will need the cooperation of the president and patriotic government. It is easy to imagine how much could harm hateful and arrogant Komorowski, working with the destructive opposition and the media, which suddenly przypomniałyby of the control function in relation to the government.
After these general recommendations, I would like to devote a few sentences on how we should make some concrete arguments and respond to certain specific allegations. Incidentally, I do not consider myself a person characterized by the extraordinary wisdom that such a recommendation from each pass. These recommendations are rather a result of the dedication of work to gather and organize the scattered arguments that I found as particularly important and valuable in today's situation.
For starters let us note that the argument of our opponents is carefully thought out and insidious. It is prepared in the form of some kind of trap. An example is insistent the main burden of managing political conflicts in this election campaign on the issue of whether Jaroslaw Kaczynski really changed or whether the change is merely a diabolical plan directed against Poland. The trap lies in the fact that just the discussion on this topic is the admission that among Polish politicians Kaczynski is in a special obligation to change, and perhaps even better would be if in some way degrading for you odszczekał their current views and may even withdrew his candidature in the elections. If we reply that has not changed, it will be treated as an admission that he is trying to come to power on deceit. If you answer that has changed, we resent this lack of consistency and in general what we PiS, if he wants to be the second OP.
key to a correct answer to this question-complaint is a breakthrough understanding of the importance of the Smolensk disaster. Of course, the opponent and there is no ready-made arguments. First, significantly reduced the rank of the event, even though it was a catastrophe unprecedented in history, and its symbolism was quite striking. Trying to move quickly on this disaster on the agenda, and for the whole explanation is suffice for us is that the pilots allegedly made a string of mindless decision. Minor narrative of the disaster complete reports about the shocking neglected in the investigation conducted. Well, who would bother with negligent investigation, since the disaster was not very significant? Secondly, the opponent uses blackmail in the sense that any guide for this catastrophe is to be tantamount to abuse victims for political struggle. This blackmail, we can not give up. We can defer the settlement of these failings of the previous disaster and neglect in the investigation of the disaster. But we may remind you of crucial importance and meaning of the Smolensk disaster for Polish politics. Every Pole has every right to feel and experience the shock of an internal transformation after the incident, the more he had to do so by law brother of our president. I think that Jaroslaw Kaczynski has changed in the sense that he walks his by even more confident and looks even further ahead than before. Not only was not to be destroyed, but the policy has become a very good politician, a perfect and certainly dangerous for those who do have the Polish raison d'etat.
Fourth Republic was a good response from 2005 to the swollen issues that remain to us in the fall after the 1989 revolution rationed. But time moves on, priorities change. Smolensk disaster changed the Poles, and proof that you do not have to look. He was a national week in which our pain experienced with due solemnity and dignity. Home media and government for a while she did some sort of tiny, and its main representatives are buried somewhere. I still have in mind the endless kondukty, mournful music, and hundreds of thousands of people in the suburbs of Krakow. The question of whether Jaroslaw Kaczynski has changed is therefore correct. Kaczynski gives us just the current response to the new situation in which Poland is today, the current problems and threats. This response is a rejection of the old disputes for joint efforts to maintain the Polish sovereignty.
Another argument against Kaczynski, is the daring juggling concepts right and left . In short, it sounds like this: we (PO / SLD) are a good right hand and a good left, and they (PiS) are bad right and wrong left. In this breakneck-right rhetoric adjectives , leftist for the PO and the SLD is to be praised, and for the PiS - reprovingly.
political fact has become a disturbing success Napieralski. Do it worries me that the Polish left can once again count on a substantial base in society, or even the fact that behind the scenes co-PO and the SLD might lead some voters Napieralski oriented in these games for the passage of the Komorowski in the second round. The point is that the candidate is relatively unknown, with no predisposition to the office of president, he could be so significantly Launched in such a short time. Change of support from a few to several percent within approximately 2 weeks is closely correlated with the intense launch on television. Worrying is the ease with which you can control society. Napieralski result can be seen as a very successful experiment system and the signal that such methods will be continued and improved.
I will spare the discussions about the possible structure of the electorate Napieralski. It is clear that the electorate must be taken seriously. Media willing to promote the narrative that Kaczynski leftists flirting or courting apply to Napieralski. Words flirt and courtship are repeated often and with emphasis, because it is a manipulation of language. These are strenuous attempts to the only serious political leader in Poland up to the seriousness of that term, even with the kind of language used in the comments.
Jaroslaw Kaczynski said in Szczecin unusual words: "Let us say that we are a leftist. Maybe we're a little bit. Today, moreover, we use the word "left" is, and not post-communism. Because something happened symbolic, paid attention, others, but I also say to you. In this terrible disaster, and people died - and that people mature - from the generation that was still active in the communist regime, from that formation. And there is something that has a symbolic dimension, and therefore I am today, I'd always been told "Left", I would not use that word, which used the same. " From the beginning, when analyzed in the Smolensk disaster, did not give me peace, Jerzy Szmajdzinski on the list of victims. This is one of the very core of this formation, which for the past 21 years considered itself the heir of the rightful owner of the Party and Polish. There is no way that anyone of them deliberately sacrificed Szmajdziński. This gift really makes a difference, but there are other issues. After 21 years of tracking down the perpetrators of communist crimes turned into a sad farce, the latest agents and officers were SB slowly end their rotten lives, IPN was violently taken over by the PO, and society as a whole did not quite understand what it was all about. Lech Kaczynski praised and honored so many heroes of Solidarity, how many lost. If Poland did so little for historical justice, it will remain forever a disgrace to our future generations, but make up for it no longer can. The Civic Platform
so much already tangled up in juggling deadlines and right left that it is better that they be excused from their views, which is so secretive in the past year while the media lansowały artificial deadline postpolityka . They want to have cake and eat it. Szermują liberalism, but ashamed of the intention to privatize health care and the drag on this curious process ("party program on the website is a work program" - some sort of mockery). Criticized for alleged left-wing Law and Justice, but they think it Komorowski has a "natural" right to vote leftist Napieralski, does not even need not to solicit. Strange it all.
must admit that last year did not facilitate people to organize the concepts right and left . Columnists in the name of the political order of cities to explain the concept and organize only the entry of more and more confused. Right it is the respect of private property in the economy and moral conservatism. Left this quest for control of the state (today it took the form of focus control and regulatory powers in the hands of increasingly powerful offices, including transnational), and moral liberalism. PiS is a party in every way right-wing. Concern for survival big bets in times of recession, the interests of ordinary people attempt to put an end to the supremacy of the oligarchs - that does not negate the right-wing views, and tries to convince us for years. This may be the room for discussion and cooperation with the ideological left. It is important, and that the PiS, at least openly and boldly make their demands, while the PO so fancy, that for years no one can find in the party's policy of economic liberalism declared pompously.
Remember that the 10th April 2010 ended with the time of shame for patriotism in a free Poland. The Civic Platform has lost the right, which, moreover, itself acknowledged, to ensure that the electorate PiS challenge of mohair, send to a corner and pacify. Mocking the message in the style of the Provincial Palikot and lost its attractiveness and power. Nowak, PO szydzący "A lie has short legs like a duckling" does not look to cool wesołka - is embarrassing. Serious PO supporters at these jumps unless they feel such embarrassment that only feel sorry for them. Remember that we are characterized by dignity, the pride of Polish and serious treatment of public affairs. It should be sympathetic and vote for PiS Jarosław Kaczynski.
0 comments:
Post a Comment