Institute of National Remembrance, whose main goal was to survey recent Polish history, especially the Nazi and communist crimes in the Polish nation, was established only 10 years after the rebirth of independent Poland. The structures of the Institute, the research councils and the appointment of the management rules have been so constructed that the institution was independent of short-term interests of different political forces.
This resulted, among others extensive research and objective recent Polish history, especially political, social and economic development from the period of communist rule, a previously published materials, documents and studies have become an important precondition for the possibility of moral judgments of public life, regardless of location on the political scene and then present time. The results of these studies have lead to the disclosure of uncomfortable and morally reprehensible behavior and attitudes of the people associated with anti-communist opposition, people who have often been created on the moral authorities. Such actions constitute an important element of purification of public life and a fair settlement with the past.
Fair, in the spirit of truth, deal with this difficult past is the foundation of social order and moral condition of genuine democracy. Some elites fear of consistent disclosure of the truth or for political expediency chase broke into the Institute of National Remembrance, seeking to liquidate or reduce their activities or simply to take over political control over its functioning and objectives of the research.
These are - in our opinion - the conditions adopted by the parliament amendments to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance. Entry into force of the amendment to the act will mean that Poland was the only former communist bloc deprived of the possibility of a fair settlement with the past and build their political elites-free people who are unworthy, stained in cooperation with security services in a totalitarian state.
particular concern in the wake of the amended Act:
1.Zmiana rules for choosing the president of IPN, a simple majority by the Parliament, making that the primary criterion for selecting the President will be its responsiveness to the parliamentary majority. So far, the appointment of the President of the Polish Parliament by a majority of three fifths of the votes for approval Senate forced the company to create a consensus of the main political forces and uniezależniał president of the Institute and the current political interests.
second Particular outrage raises the obvious omission of the requirement to passing the vetting members of the college of electors and candidates to the IPN, which is contrary to the requirement formulated to conform to their high moral values.
third The biggest outcry raised that allow access to other staff officers and security authorities, not only the PRL to act on them, but they produce under the operations connected with their "work- or service in the security agencies. " This solution opens up a wide field of law to blackmail. The current law is rightly excluded. It is not only a "historical justice" but the fact that the SB officers will be able to determine what materials are preserved. Thanks to many of them given the opportunity to blackmail his former informants. It is also unclear why the employees of the IPN would have to spend your time, and thus the taxpayers' money in a query for people who served totalitarianism.
4th Bizarre is the principle of sharing original documents. The law previously in force are referred to copies of the documents, which is much more reasonable. Files Brief to create great excitement and a lot of people, including also some former dissidents, publicly demanded the destruction, or "in concrete" (!) IPN file. Certainly many people will be conspicuously destroyed the original documents, regardless of the consequences.
5th Causes surprise removal of the current law a very important research goal: "to develop the activities of organs of state security" (Article 23 in paragraph 2 paragraph 6).
6.Nie it no you can accept the rigors of the Law on the National Remembrance Institute staff such institutions as the censor, the Office for Religious and those serving in foreign civilian and security (Article 5 paragraph. 1 paragraphs 13 and 14, and paragraphs. 2) .
accept with great regret that so many Members of the Civic Platform, derived from the Solidarity movement and the democratic opposition would vote for such changes in the Institute of National Remembrance. We therefore call and kindly asking for their fellow Senators to a "chamber of reflection" rejected the harmful amendment. The ideals of truth and honesty in public life that have guided our actions at that time, also apply today.
If passed by parliament in spite of all this amendment, we turn to the Lord Professor of Polish President Lech Kaczynski of the veto.
prof. dr hab. Stanislaw Alexandrowicz GCM
Chris Andrews
AMU prof. dr hab. Marek Andrzejewski University. Szcz
Dr. Rose Antkowiak
AMU prof. dr hab. Wieslaw Antkowiak UAM
Assoc. Dr. Baehr Olgierd
MSc. Joseph Bancewicz University Poznan
Dr. Lidia Banowska AMU
Arthur Bazak - editor of "Political Theology"
MSc. Krzysztof Bak
Dr. Maria Bak
AMU prof. dr hab. Jacek Blazewicz
Poznan University prof. dr hab. Slawomir Bralewski University. Lodz
prof. dr hab. Peter Briks University. Szcz
Dr. Elizabeth Czarniewska
AMU prof. dr hab. Janusz Czebreszuk
AMU prof. dr hab. Jacek Dabert
AMU prof. dr hab. Malgorzata Dabrowska University. Lodz
prof. dr hab. Ursula Prokop Dąmbska-UJ
Artur Dmochowski, creator TVP Historia
prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Dopierała
AMU prof. dr hab. Edward Dutkiewicz
AMU prof. dr hab. Maria Dutkiewicz
AMU prof. dr hab. Maria Dzielska UJ
Tadeusz Dziuba
prof. dr hab. Wojciech Fałkowski University. Warsaw
prof. dr hab. George Fedorowski
AMU prof. dr hab. Thomas Gąsowski UJ
Eng. George Grabus
Christine Grabus
prof. dr hab. Grynia Maria University. Life Sciences Poznan
prof. dr hab. Halina Grzmiel-Tylutki UJ
Dr. Jolanta Hajdasz Wyż. school they can. Socio. Classifieds
prof. dr hab. Sophia Hryniewiecka-Szyfter UAM
prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Jacyna-Onyszkiewicz
UAM dr hab. Jaroslaw Jagiellonian University them. John Dlugosz, Czestochowa
Ursula M. Jagiello psychologist Professor
Czestochowa. dr hab. Jankowska Dobrochna UAM
prof. dr hab. Arthur Jarmołowicz
AMU prof. dr hab. Tomasz Jasinski UAM
Dr. Joseph Kapusta Institute of Biotechnology and Antibiotics Warsaw
prof. dr hab. Maria Korytowska UJ
prof. dr hab. Edmund Kozal University. Nature. Classifieds
prof. dr hab. Henry Huckabee Krakow Pedagogical University, Dr. Henry
Krzyzanowski AMU
Dariusz Kucharski UAM - The Association of Ideas Workshop
Dr. Agnes Kurnik WSFP Krakow
Ph.D. Laskowicz
prof. dr hab. Ignacy Lewandowski UAM
Bernard Ladysz
prof. dr hab. Leokadia Ladysz
prof. dr hab. George Marcinek Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dr. Bozena
Mikolajczak
AMU prof. dr hab. Stanislaw Mikolajczak UAM
prof. dr hab. Greg had to UAM
prof. dr hab. Elzbieta Nowicka UAM
prof. dr hab. Radoslaw Okulicz-Kozaryn
AMU prof. dr hab. Miroslaw Ołdakowska CUL-Kuflowa
Wladyslaw Classifieds Opiat
prof. dr hab. Jan Paradysz Poznan University of Economics
prof. dr hab. Stanisław Paszkowski Poznan University of Life Sciences
MSc. Andrew Pienkowski
MSc. Maria Pieńkowska
prof. dr hab. Jan Prokop members. Corresponding. PAU
PhD. Jan Prostko-Prostyński AMU
Dr. Wieslaw Ratajczak AMU
prof. dr hab. Rorate Thaddeus Institute of Plant Genetics
Dr. Lech Poznan Rozanski
Prof. dr hab. Wojciech Rypniewski PAN Poznan
prof. dr hab. John Sadowski UAM
prof. dr hab. John Skuratowicz UAM
prof. dr hab. Anna Stankowska
AMU prof. dr hab. Wojciech Stankowski
AMU prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Stępczak
AMU prof. dr hab. Eugeniusz Szczesniak
AMU prof. dr hab. Sophia Szweykowska-Kulińska AMU
prof. dr hab. Henryk Szydlowski
AMU prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Świrydowicz UAM
Teresa M. Świrydowicz
historian Jerzy Targalski
prof. Ewa Thompson, Rice University, Houston
prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Tobolski
AMU prof. dr hab. Lech Poznan University of Medical Torliński
prof. dr hab. Andrzej Urbaniak, Poznan University of Technology
prof. dr hab. Matt Urbanowski UJ
prof. dr. Richard Vorbrich
AMU prof. dr hab. Andrew Wasko UJ
prof. dr hab. Elizabeth Wesołowska
AMU prof. dr hab. Zygmunt Zagorski
AMU prof. dr hab. Stefan Zawadzki UAM
MSc. Thomas Zdziebkowski
prof. dr hab. Zofia Zielinska University. Warsaw
prof. dr hab. Maria Ziolek UAM
Andrzej Zak
http://www.rp.pl/artykul/2, 450713.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment